<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LAUREATE EX MACHINA: How John Ashbery composes poetry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178</link>
	<description>Reëstablishing the ubiquity of quality literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blogging through Grossman, Part 3: Where are we? Poetic Promiscuity.</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging through Grossman, Part 3: Where are we? Poetic Promiscuity.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>[...] (Halliday described Ashbery as “melting together…syntactical fragments that could have been quite at home in a poem from an earlier age.” For a fuller explanation of this, I recommend Chris Robinson’s opus on how Ashbery composes poetry.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Halliday described Ashbery as “melting together…syntactical fragments that could have been quite at home in a poem from an earlier age.” For a fuller explanation of this, I recommend Chris Robinson’s opus on how Ashbery composes poetry.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Tanya, for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Tanya, for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Funny, brilliant bit of satire.  Thank you for writing such a fabulous piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, brilliant bit of satire.  Thank you for writing such a fabulous piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tadd Adcox</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>Tadd Adcox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why this is anything other than a brilliant way of composing poetry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why this is anything other than a brilliant way of composing poetry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diogenes23</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>diogenes23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>I think you might have been the subject of what Duchamp did. Lead others down the wrong alley ( his statements about his work and his sister) . The Machine might be a fraud. or his use of it. You cannot know. if his poetry were a &#039;fraud&#039;, then his &#039;method&#039; might be also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you might have been the subject of what Duchamp did. Lead others down the wrong alley ( his statements about his work and his sister) . The Machine might be a fraud. or his use of it. You cannot know. if his poetry were a &#8216;fraud&#8217;, then his &#8216;method&#8217; might be also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (not) Brent Newland</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>(not) Brent Newland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>mebbe poemmashine 2.0 will have like tank treads and it will fit in the palm of yr hand..... in the majickal world of the futer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mebbe poemmashine 2.0 will have like tank treads and it will fit in the palm of yr hand&#8230;.. in the majickal world of the futer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Michael,

You are correct in saying that machine does not &#039;need&#039; wheels. You can understand my resultant confusion, then, upon discovering said wheels. Ashbery, it seems, intentionally limited the Machine&#039;s locomotive capabilities. Don&#039;t ask me why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>You are correct in saying that machine does not &#8216;need&#8217; wheels. You can understand my resultant confusion, then, upon discovering said wheels. Ashbery, it seems, intentionally limited the Machine&#8217;s locomotive capabilities. Don&#8217;t ask me why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>I believed everything until the mention of The Machine&#039;s wheels.

I mean, puhlease. Do some research before writing awesome-dope articles like this. Everyone knows The Machine doesn&#039;t have wheels. Why in the world would it need wheels? It teleports itself, didn&#039;t you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believed everything until the mention of The Machine&#8217;s wheels.</p>
<p>I mean, puhlease. Do some research before writing awesome-dope articles like this. Everyone knows The Machine doesn&#8217;t have wheels. Why in the world would it need wheels? It teleports itself, didn&#8217;t you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>(not) Brent,

No, no. I meant &#039;complements&#039;, as in Jonathan&#039;s statements really serve to complete the current discussion. Does that not sound write to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(not) Brent,</p>
<p>No, no. I meant &#8216;complements&#8217;, as in Jonathan&#8217;s statements really serve to complete the current discussion. Does that not sound write to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (not) Brent Newland</title>
		<link>http://www.flatmancrooked.com/archives/5178#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>(not) Brent Newland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flatmancrooked.com/?p=5178#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>um i think u mean compliments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um i think u mean compliments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
