Launch New Novella Hyperlimited Anthology

‘A Prophet’

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Kenneth Turan LA Times

Genre is powerful, especially in the hands of as gifted a filmmaker as France’s Jacques Audiard. His new film, the masterful “A Prophet,” is an answered prayer for those who believe that revitalizing classic forms with contemporary attitudes makes for the most compelling kind of cinema.

Part prison film, part crime story, part intense personal drama, this all-consuming narrative with the power and drive of a Formula One racer has been something of a phenomenon since it took the grand jury prize at Cannes last year. A “Sight & Sound” poll of 60 critics worldwide named it the best film of 2009, it’s one of the five foreign-language film Oscar nominees, it took Britain’s prestigious BAFTA award in that category and, with 13 nominations overall, it’s a prohibitive favorite to win the Cesar, France’s Oscar, for best picture. (Read More)

1 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

An Israeli Tale of Communal Mistrust, Without the Finger-Pointing

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

A.O. Scott of The New York Times has  an interesting review of “Ajami,” Israel’s submission to the Oscars for Best Foreign Film.  “Ajami” is opening in the States now to a limited release, so check your local times and listings.

Written and directed by Scandar Copti, an Israeli Arab (who also plays an important supporting role), and Yaron Shani, who is Jewish, the film is acutely insightful about the social divisions within Israel, but it examines them without scolding or sentimentality.

There is no finger-pointing here, and no group hugging either. Instead there is a sharp sense of just how deep and wide the schisms are, not just between Jews and Arabs but also between Christians and Muslims, rich and poor, farmers and city dwellers, men and women, young and old and so on. (read more)

2 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

‘Terribly Happy’: Town Without Pity

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Kurt Loder over at MTV does a good job of getting me excited about the Danish film”Terribly Happy.”  In case you don’t keep up on cutting edge cinema, Denmark has been one of the top producers of interesting film lately (see: “Antichrist,” “Burma VJ,” “Brotherhood,” and “Applause”).

A Nordic Creepfest the Coen Brothers Might Admire

The movie is wonderfully warped. There are overtones of horror and noirish depravity that recall both the 1973 cult film “The Wicker Man” and Shirley Jackson’s famous 1948 short story, “The Lottery.” But “Terribly Happy,” which was Denmark’s submission in the foreign-language category for this year’s Oscars (and will soon be remade in English), has a mind-knotting fascination of its own. Working from an adaptation of an Erling Jepsen novel by screenwriter Dunja Gry Jensen, director Henrik Ruben Genz builds tension in oblique increments. We see that the downcast Hansen (Jakob Cedergren) isn’t quite right in the head himself — he screwed up in Copenhagen (exactly how, we don’t learn till late in the film), and this reassignment to the faraway village of Skarrild is his only chance to salvage his career. The troubled cop is already taking anti-anxiety medication — with which the local doctor (Lars Brygmann) is oddly eager to keep him well-supplied — and the director presents the flat, featureless landscape as an emblem of his isolation and unease. (read more)


3 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

The Quiet Power of A Single Man

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Tom Ford’s directorial debut, A Single Man, is notable not only for Colin Firth’s subtle portrayal of a man struggling to live on after the sudden death of his longtime partner, but for how Ford employs the motif of silence to buffer his film’s inherently sentimental subject matter.  For example, in the film’s most overt portrayal of emotion, Ford cuts the sound as a distraught George (Firth), a reserved British intellectual, bursts into a grief-filled torrent of tears.  In the typical melodrama, every sob and wail would be lingered over — with swelling music no less — but here Ford buffers the expected cinematic excess by having the viewer experience the loss of a loved one through an auditory loss. In an essentially realist film that focuses on human relationships, silence allows Ford to evoke authentic emotion while avoiding one of the great problems, indeed, paradoxes of realism: how to realistically portray human experience without succumbing to sentimentality.  After all, real life is messy; people cry and wail.

Instead of violent emotion, A Single Man achieves its effects more subtly like Pixar’s Up, by imbuing everyday objects with powerful emotional, sensual associations.  In the car crash that killed Jim, for example, the two terriers they had raised together, surrogate children, also died.  Later in the film, as George plans suicide, he reexperiences this lost love bond through the scent of toast and butter on another terrier’s fur.  As George lingers in this quiet reunion, his reluctance to end the moment suggests the power of the commonplace in our lives, of how certain textures and smells recall the irretrievable objects of our past.

The theme of silence which resonates subtly throughout A Single Man, of course, is also a reminder of the real tragedy of George’s loss: that his grief has been censored by a society which demands his invisibility.  He is not allowed the benefit of condolence and ritual by participating in Jim’s funeral; he is excluded and denied the status of an official “family member.”  His last sixteen years with his partner have been omitted from the record.  Through this erasure by uncontrollable external forces, as demonstrated by the repeated metaphor of a man quietly drowning in the ocean, the film suggests, especially in George’s final moments, that suffering is most extreme when experienced in silence.

10 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

Certainty and a Sure Hand Behind The White Ribbon’s Unsolved Mystery

Monday, January 11th, 2010

If you’re not a Michael Haneke fan yet, or you haven’t seen any of his films (Cache, Funny Games), then his latest endeavor, The White Ribbon, which seems to be gaining nearly universal critical praise, will almost certainly win over most of you stragglers.  Check out J. Hoberman’s review over at The Village Voice for a tantalizing taste of the auteur’s latest postmodern mystery:

“Detailed yet oblique, leisurely but compelling, perfectly cast and irreproachably acted, the movie has a seductively novelistic texture complete with a less-than-omniscient narrator hinting at a weighty historical thesis: It’s Village of the Damned as re-imagined by Thomas Mann after studying August Sander’s photographs of German types while perusing Wilhelm Reich’s Mass Psychology of Fascism.” (read more)

2 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

What We Loved in 2009

Friday, January 1st, 2010

We wanted to wait until the 1st of January to put this up. Everyone jumps right on the My-2009-List bandwagon days, sometimes even weeks, before the New Year. What if something happens on the eve that displaces an item previously thought invaluable? So, without further delay, below is a list of things Flatmancrooked staff enjoyed in 2009. This list is not divided into categories or ordered by importance but rather alphabetized because the alphabet is good for you. Feel free to add to our list if there is something you loved that we should have.

#

The scene in 2012 where the entire state of California falls into the sea.

A

Garner by Kirstin Allio

B

Bittorrent

Nazi Literature in the Americas & Last Evenings On Earth by Roberto Bolano

Bobby Flay’s Mesa Grill in Las Vegas, NV


Bon Iver

BookCourt in Brooklyn, NY

Small Craft Warnings: Stories by Kate Braverman

Brooklyn, NY

C

Await Your Reply by Dan Chaon

Champiñones al Ajillo at Tapa the World in Sacramento, CA

D

Deena’s Bjork costumedeenabjork

Dexter

One Story Issue # 128: The Restoration of the Villa Where Tibor Kálmán Once Lived” by Tamas Dobozy

E

Elegy (Penelope Cruz and Ben Kingsley) – Released in 2008 but it was so good we just kept enjoying it.

Baby Leg by Brian Evenson

Last Days by Brian Evenson

The Wavering Knife by Brian Evenson

Fugue State by Brian Evenson

F

Fantastic Mr. Fox

Fly-Over State by Emma Straub

The Poems of Emily Dickinson, Ed. by R.W. Franklin

the Forecast project

Pizza at Franny’s in Brooklyn

G

The Arsenic Lobster: A Hybrid Memoir by Peter Grandbois

H

The House of the Devil

I

Illegal Art

Inland Empire

In the Loop (“Shut Up, love actually!”)

J

Josh liked finishing Grad School

Extreme amounts of Joy

K

Koshihikari Echigo Beer at Tamaya Sushi in Sacramento, CA

L

Just Enough A.J. Liebling,with an intro by David Remnick

Lovin’

M

M + E’s Chronic City poster

Macaroni & Cheese, Fried Chicken at Paul Martin’s

Mad Men

Maker’s Mark

The Momofuku Cookbook

Ding Dong at Mulvanney’s in Sacramento

N

The National

The Nervous Breakdown

The Next Country by Idra Novey

Not About Vampires from Flatmancrooked

O

Barack Obama Inauguration

P

Pork Belly Tacos at B Star in San Francisco, CA

Precious (if you haven’t seen this movie . . . you’re kinda silly)



A Defense of Poetry by Gabriel Gudding

R

The Road

The Rumpus

S

Salvadore Plascencia

She Wolf by Shakira

Single Ladies by Beyonce

Soup

Stillwater Cove: Sonoma County, CA

Poe’s Children: The New Horror – An Anthology, edited by Peter Straub

Emma Straub

T

Tea

Theft (or repositioning) of hotel topiary

W

The New Valley by Josh Weil

The White Ribbon

Y

It’s Blitz! – Yeah Yeah Yeah’s

Once the Shore by Paul Yoon


8 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

THE HURT LOCKER: How Kathryn Bigelow de-politicized the Iraq War

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

James Kaelan will have an essay about the Iraq War Film Renaissance over at The Millions next week. In celebration of this year’s crop, Flatmancrooked is re-running his review of The Hurt Locker, the film that started the trend.


Since it germinated in earnest four years ago, the crop of Afghanistan and Iraq films has been anemic. Reading the reviews, in most cases, is more entertaining than watching the films themselves. Take for instance the hastily braided Lions for Lambs by Robert Redford, starring Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise. It has three fifths the narrative breadth of Alejandro Iñárritu’s Babel. But whereas Iñarritu ties his storylines together with raw emotion, Redford lashes his together with wonkishness. This comes from Anthony Lane’s review of Lions in the New Yorker:

    “The three stories are intercut throughout the film, to lend it at least the illusion of momentum. Sadly, unless you are Jean-Luc Godard, the sight of your characters discussing the political ethics of their own actions is unlikely to ravish the eye, and Lions for Lambs is most charitably described as Ibsen with helicopters. It winces with liberal self-chastisement: Redford is surely smart enough to realize, as the professor turns to ire on those who merely chatter while Rome burns, that his movie is itself no better, or more morally effective, than high-concept Hollywood fiddling.”

Last year the indomitable men behind The Wire—David Simon and Ed Burns—managed to put together something of a masterpiece on the invasion of Iraq for HBO. But Generation Kill was still a political film. One came away after eight hours feeling the war was a horrendous mistake and that the incursion wasn’t as simple as an earthquake; after we’d sacked the cities, we couldn’t just fix the roads and bridges. Generation Kill is an indictment of the Bush Administration, just as The Wire is an indictment of Baltimore’s bureaucracies. In both series there are good men and women doing bad things and achieving dismal results.

The Hurt Locker is another sort of film. It follows the fate of three soldiers in Iraq charged with disarming IEDs in Baghdad. Staff Sergeant William James (Jeremy Renner) replaces Sergeant Matt Thompson (Guy Pearce) after Thompson is killed in the line of duty. James is as unconcerned with danger as James Bond is with venereal disease, and he approaches his work with the spiritual calm of a man raking a rock garden. What is immediately evident watching The Hurt Locker is that the film is existential rather than polemical. The soldiers aren’t interested in why they’re in country. The other men on James’ team—Sergeant JT Sanborn (Anthony Mackie) and Specialist Owen Eldridge (Brian Geraghty) are concerned only with surviving till they leave. James, on the other hand, seems captivated by his work and pursues it with the Platonic conviction that all labor is ethically sound if done excellently.

For someone opposed to the war from the first rumors, this film served as a revelation. There is nothing romantic about The Hurt Locker. It is not a sentimental portrait of brotherhood (the soldiers bond by drinking and punching each other in the stomach). And yet somewhere within the first half hour I found myself wishing I were with them in the desert. The soldiers’ work is arduous, to say nothing of deadly, but James’ approach to defusing his bombs is elegantly simple. He appears at peace working, and that calm amidst one of the tensest dramas in recent film history is intoxicating. He is not so different from the poet striving to write a clear image.

There are minor flaws, of course. We’re so prepared for the films’ first explosion that when the bomb does go off, the surprise is no greater than if we’d seen a controlled building demolition. It produces none of the shock, for instance, one feels in the opening minutes of Children of Men, when the sudden blast interrupts an otherwise peaceful London street. Alfonso Cuarón’s violence conveys the emotion of terrorism, whereas Kathryn Bigelow’s violence, at least in the beginning, celebrates the science. But Bigelow is certainly at her career best, here. The camerawork throughout is redolent of Paul Greengrass’ United 93—hand-held, but to a specific end. Unlike César Charlone’s photography in The Constant Gardener, where he shook the camera even at the dinner table, the look of The Hurt Locker is both effectively intimate and unsettling. This is not a film of pretty photographs, nor should it be.

I’m not the first to predict that people will study The Hurt Locker in twenty years for clues to the nature of the Iraq War, but I’d like to add my endorsement. This film is a document rather than a lesson. By avoiding the political fray, it gives viewers insight, regardless of perspective, into the objective circumstances of the conflict. The Hurt Locker doesn’t ask whether we made the right decision going into Baghdad, and yet it doesn’t skirt the subject. Rather it proves how impertinent such a question is to the soldiers risking their lives. On a personal level, war is a series of tasks one tries to complete alive. Anything beyond that is a distraction.


By James Kaelan

5 people like this post.
  • Share/Bookmark

DISTRICT 9: Darfur for shrimp

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Gripping, disgusting, fantastic, corny, sentimental, and unsound, District 9 is a smorgasbord of sensory experiences, designed to keep you engaged, enthralled, and mildly sea sick.

Wikus is an employee of Multi-National United (MNU), a private corporation charged with “managing” earth’s alien population. Management, we find out early on, entails the eviction of the 1.2 million aliens–derogatively called “prawns”–from their earthly dwelling. It’s the newly promoted Wikus who must cart the shrimp out of District 9 down the road to the much nicer concentration camp, aptly named District 10 (i.e., the Sequel-Nod).

The aliens came to earth 28 years ago and decided ominously to hover over, of all places, Johannesburg (That the director didn’t switch the location to New York suggests both the source material and the philosophical intentions of the film aren’t the usual summer blockbuster fare). After weeks of the alien ship sitting statically, the South African government cut a hole in the hull to find out what the hell was going on. What they found was a gaggle of malnourished, relatively docile alien beings very much resembling 8-foot shrimp (hence the nickname) with legs.

The shrimp were quarantined, and official legislation passed restricting both their movement and their rights. We find out quickly that the aliens are a bit faster and stronger than humans, but of roughly the same mental capacity. Unlike most science fiction films featuring alien invaders, therefore, the threat of the “other” is mild. The shrimp speak in garbled clicks, they form gangs, they like to gorge themselves on black-market cat food sold to them by the Nigerians, and they have weapons that respond only to alien touch (which the South African government want to use). But rather than wanting to destroy earth, the shrimp just want to leave.

Now, in the true spirit of High Horse, I’d like to explore some critical opinions espoused over the last few weeks. I like Pete Travers of The Rolling Stone who said, “District 9, with a chump-change budget of $30 million, soars on the imagination of its creators,” which is entirely true. The visuals are stunning, the alien weapons original, and the CG as well-integrated as in the much more expensive War of the Worlds from 2005. But the conflict and, to some degree, the loose political themes created by the writers and director are what drive the film. An “intimate epic” it is not. Trying to achieve too many things may account for most of the flaws. A sort of tongue-in-cheek irony combined with stomach turning violence suggests to me the shortcomings of District 9 aren’t analogous to Evil Dead accidentally taking itself too seriously, but rather, at times, the producers refusing to make difficult editing decisions.

I whole-heartedly agree with Rick Groen of The Globe and Mail who says, “[District 9] avoids well-traveled roads to blaze a trail both different and compelling. But then the trail disappears, leaving us with a yes-and-no movie. Yes, the premise is delightful; no, the delight doesn’t last.” In the vein of 2001: A Space Odyssey, District 9 attempts to be the scholar’s sci-fi flick. There are semi-profound comments on racial-profiling and apartheid, and the wall surrounding District 9 is nothing short of West Bankian. Director Neill Blomkamp does succeed in not beating his audience to death with morality lessons. But his extravagant use of violence very nearly buries the somewhat innovative plot.

I recommend District 9 to anyone with a decent constitution and an interest in science fiction. If you’re able to keep your expectations at bay and your lunch down, it’s a well-spent two hours. Again, it’s not a deep exploration of profound political themes, but sometimes a shallower exploration is more effective. Fans of The Fly and Alien will find themselves delighted and entertained. Fans of The Devil Came on Horseback and Hotel Rwanda might enjoy it, too, provided they’re also fans of The Fly and Alien.

Special Marketing Note: District 9 created a very clever viral marketing campaign and began using late in its campaign a new technology called “augmented reality” that promises to tickle the fancies of tech nerds everywhere.


By Elijah Jenkins

  • Share/Bookmark

SIN NOMBRE: How Cary Fukunaga did what Danny Boyle couldn’t

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Within the first fifteen minutes of Sin Nombre, El Casper (Edgar Flores), as a father might teach his son to hold a bat, helps the twelve-year-old El Smiley (Kristian Ferrer) shoot a captive, rival gang member in the face with a homemade pipe gun. Killing an enemy is the second right of passage into the Mara Salvatrucha brotherhood (the first is getting beaten by a group of men for thirteen seconds). In one of the few moments of reprieve in the film, the director Cary Fukunaga chooses not to show the actual dismembering of the body. But a moment later we see the entrails dropped into a bowl for the dogs to eat.

Sin Nombre is Fukunaga’s first feature effort. He has been deservedly applauded for his debut, if for no other reason than he’s a Scando-Japanese American, and his subjects in the film are Hispanic and speak colloquial Spanish. To work in Honduras and Mexico with a foreign cast is at the very least ambitious, and makes Joe Swanberg look cowardly for keeping his inert characters in an American bedroom. There is no timidity to Fukunaga’s style, nor is there much flare.

Compared to last years’ Slumdog Millionaire, in which Danny Boyle exhibited all the directorial tenderness of a suicide bomber, Sin Nombre is quieter—and more shocking. Trying to appreciate Boyle’s India was like touring Mumbai during a volcanic eruption. Boyle wouldn’t train the camera on a subject longer than it took to film a line of dialogue, and the frenetic pace was distracting rather than compelling. Even when the proprietor of the orphanage blinds one of his wards with acid, with the camera cutting back and forth, you feel at best a sentimental horror. But you don’t experience any more agony than you would smell curry had Boyle rubbed cardamon on the lens. The violence in Sin Nombre, though, as portrayed by the cinematographer Adriano Goldman, is austere, and the tragedies haunting the characters feel abrupt, senseless, and frightening; in other words, authentic.

Slumdog was a financial success for the same reason that it was an artistic failure: it skimmed, both cinematographically and emotionally, over its subjects. It purported to be about class struggle in India, and the requisite horrors of poverty. But instead it was a shiny, loud, and clean fairytale. Slumdog overcame tragedy, but the adversity dramatized was so disingenuous that the triumph seemed saccharine at worst, and shallow at best. A lot of people, though,  must have seen Boyle’s allegory as fresh and optimistic, and the film rode that sentiment to the Oscars.

Sin Nombre, on the other hand, earns its catharsis. That’s in part because the ablution is less complete, and the expurged sins more abhorrent. The characters and their struggles seem real, in no small part because many of the actors hail from the neighborhoods where the film was shot. Some of the Mareros in the film are Mareros in real life; they didn’t need fake tattoos. But that is not to say the film is flawless. The acting is consistently solid, but Flores—the nucleus of Sin Nombre—as the quiet and brooding Casper, feels inaccessible. Even when he opens up, briefly near the end of the film, we see only a moment of warmth, and this softer disposition isn’t completely convincing. It’s preceded by too much unmitigated rage.

For all the murderers and rapists and rape victims that populate the film, only Lil Mago (Tenoch Huerta Mejia), the leader of the local Mara Salvatrucha gang, displays exquisite dynamism. He vacillates between tenderness and brutality, and at his best, holds onto both emotions simultaneously. He is as ominous a character to look at as I can remember—his face is black with tattoos—but early in the film, while overseeing Casper and Smiley as they shoot the prisoner in the face, he holds his infant son proudly, kissing him on the forehead. The scene gains all its power from this juxtaposition of paternal love and unapologetic violence. The murder, made all the more horrible by the presence of the boy (who we know must grow up to be a killer like his father), lays out the ethics of the film: honor is paramount, and each life has a shifting, unequal value.

This is exceptionally difficult material to handle in a first film. If at the end I felt somewhat disconnected from El Casper—whom we follow from Tepachula to the Texas border—I wonder if it wasn’t Fukunaga’s intention. After all, Sin Nombre is not a film about absolution. It is about immigration and violence and the trappings of poverty. Rather than cauterizing wounds like Boyle did with Slumdog, Fukunaga opens them further. He doesn’t canonize his characters, because every act of heroism is bound to an act of cowardice. Accordingly, Sin Nombre is not a charming film. It doesn’t make you feel better for having seen it. And that’s why it’s important.


By James Kaelan

  • Share/Bookmark